This Blog was updated on 26/11/2018 – for latest developments, please see the update at the end of the article below.
The government has announced amendments to the procedure for applying for probate in England and Wales, with less than a month’s notice. The Statutory Instrument (The Non-Contentious Probate (Amendment) Rules 2018) will come into force on 27 November 2018.
The Rules were laid as a negative instrument, meaning they don’t need the approval of Parliament and have already been signed into law by the relevant Minister. The instrument can be annulled by Parliament before implementation, but this is rare.
In brief the amended rules:
- allow personal online applications for probate to be made by an unrepresented applicant;
- enable all applications for probate to be verified by a statement of truth (instead of an oath) and without the will having to be marked (by the applicant, solicitor or probate practitioner);
- extend time limits in the caveat process, which give the person registering the caveat notice of any application for probate;
- allow caveat applications and standing searches (which give notice of grants being issued) to be made electronically;
- extend the powers of district probate registrars equivalent to those of district judges; and
- make further provision for the issue of directions (instructions to the parties) in relation to hearings.
The Probate Service has accepted online applications from personal applicants (individuals not represented by probate specialists) since earlier this year, with a view to making the system simpler and ‘easier to understand’.
There are concerns that the introduction of the online service may discourage individuals from using a probate specialist where it may be advisable to do so, for example where the estate is taxable, has foreign or complex components, or may be disputed.
The announcement comes at the same time as the Ministry of Justice’s proposal to increase the probate application fee with a banded fee structure depending on the value of the estate.
STEP strongly opposed this new system when it was proposed in 2016, on the basis that it is disproportionate to the service provided by the probate court. It is effectively a new tax on bereaved families. The government intends to introduce this measure without any proper debate via Statutory Instrument (see STEP blog: The death tax returns).
STEP will continue to follow developments in this area.
UPDATE 26/11/2018
HMCTS has advised that they will shortly provide further information with regard to the template of the statement of truth, but at present it is their intention only to make small changes to the current oath format to ensure that it fits with the new procedure and to make sure that practitioners do not need to change the format completely. They will soon provide template wording that must replace the jurat at the foot of the oath, as well as wording to account for the removal of the need to sign the will.
HMTCS have also provided guidance on the changes to the way caveat applications can be submitted. This is as follows.
Please note the following changes to Rule 44 regarding caveats:
- Rules 44(2) (b) and 44 (3) (a) and (b): Caveats can now be entered and extended via email as well as post. If the caveat is to be entered electronically, the caveat form should be emailed to the DPR solicitors enquiries address. The email attaching the caveat form should ask for the fee to be taken from your PBA account. The fee must be paid before the caveat is entered/extended and currently there is no provision to pay a fee electronically other than by use of a PBA account. The caveat should be in the prescribed form i.e. form 3 (precedent form number 41 in Tristram & Cootes Probate Practice, 31st Edition). Caveats received after 4pm will be entered the following day.
- Rules 44(6),(10) and (12): The period for entering an appearance/summons for directions following a warning to a caveat is now 14 days (calendar days including weekends and Bank Holidays).
- Rule 44(13): District Probate Registrars can now deal with all summons to discontinue caveats following an appearance – whether by consent or not. The summons should be sent to the registry where the grant application is pending and if there is no application pending to the registry where the caveat was entered.
- Rule 44(14): District Probate Registrars can now deal with applications to enter a further caveat entered by or on behalf of any caveator whose caveat is either in force or has ceased to have effect under R44(7) or (12) and under R45(4) and R46(3). These applications should be sent to the registry where the caveat was entered.
- R45(3) and R46(3): Registrars can now deal with applications under these rules.
- R43: Standing Searches can now be entered and extended via email as well as post. If the Standing Search is to be entered electronically, form PA1s should be emailed to the DPR with confirmation that the fee is to be taken by PBA. The fee must be paid before the Standing Search is entered/extended and currently there is no provision to pay a fee electronically other than by use of a PBA account.
In addition, please note that caveats received after 4pm will be deemed as having been received on the following day.
I am appalled. It seems as if the present government has no understanding of or interest in the law or the need for certain aspects to be dealt with by people qualified in relevant areas. Indeed, with the retirement of earlier Probate Registrars, one wonders if some of the present Registrars have any real concern for the proper and controlled administration of our law. The new proposals do not show an awareness on the part of the lawmakers or the civil service as to the dishonesty of some of those whom they will be dealing with , not to mention the fact that many of those applying personally at the Probate Registry (online or not) do not remotely understand the documents they are submitting. What a sad commentary on this part of the Court system, the Ministry of Justice and our Government.